FEATURED
UPDATED: EXPOSED: How Gov. Fayemi’s Govt Inflated WAEC Fee Of 14,242 Students To The Tune Of N248.5m

Governor Kayode Fayemi’s government of Ekiti State, is at the center of a scandal running to the turn of N248.5 million involving payment of the examination fee of students sitting for the May/June West African Examination Council (WAEC), scheduled to hold later in the year, according to a report.
An investigative report BIGPEN sourced from the portal of International Centre for Investigative Reporting (ICIR), revealed that the examination fee was inflated with extra N3,500, a 25 per cent increase on each of the 14, 242 students of public secondary schools in the state.
The alleged fraud was discovered after the state government, through the Commissioner for Education, Science, and Technology, Foluso Daramola, had announced approval for the release of N248, 522, 900 to pay for the WAEC examination fee of pupils in public secondary schools in the state.
The figure quoted implies that N17, 450 is the payable fee on each student.
But according to the report, independent investigation from the Nigerian office of the West African examination body to verify the actual amount for the May/June 2020 WAEC examination, showed that the official fee is pegged at N13, 950.
If N500 bank charge is added to the N13, 950, the figure would amount to N14, 450.
“Whether it is a private candidate or public secondary schools, it is N13, 950. Aside from bank commission of N500,” Demianus Ojijeogu, WAEC spokesperson quoted in the report says.
“I am aware that some schools charge higher than that but they are not doing it in collaboration with WAEC, and we usually charge people to report such schools to the ministry of education which is the regulatory agency.”
Therefore, based on the population of the SS3 students in the state – 14,242 – the total sum released by the state government should be N198, 675, 900 at the head cost of N13, 950. But at N248.5 million disclosed by the government, a sum of N17, 450 was charged for each student.
If for instance, the state resolve to include the N500 bank charge, WAEC form for each candidate would be fixed at N14, 450, rising to N205,796,900.
Source: Ekiti Govt Official Website
The indication is that the state government has made extra N3,500 from each student to arrive at the figure disclosed to the public – a surplus of N49,847,000.
It is, however, unlikely that the bank would still charge N500 on each candidate since the state government would do a mass transfer or instruct its bank to deduct the huge amount from the state account.
Speaking with WAEC, according to ICIR which cited an instance of where state government indicates interest to take responsibility for the examination payment, Ojijeogu insisted that the same amount will be charged per head for a candidate.
“The school collects the money on behalf of WAEC with a specified registration fee,” he adds.
The reporter further informed him of the development in Ekiti State, but he insisted the only special fee payable is done by the school and not the student, which is N2,000.
“We don’t charge candidates for the photo album, except for the registration fee. We only charge N2,000 per school.”
Ojijeogu described the fee as the amount for a special register which includes photo passports of the candidates, examination numbers among other details. “We use it to identify candidates to determine an impersonator, in case the biometric fails.
“It is to confirm the candidacy of the students.”
It could be recalled that Daramola had warned school principals and registrars of the state’s public secondary schools against the collection of whatever fees, not approved by the state government.
Daramola went further to solicit for funds from other Nigerians and corporate organisations in order to contribute to the educational development of the state, especially through scholarship awards for brilliant but indigent students.
According to the report, attempt to get comments on this report from Muyiwa Olumilua, state Commissioner for Information and Civic Orientation to explain the discrepancies were fruitless as he directed inquiries to the commissioner for education.
“I think its best you talk to the commissioner for education”, he said, promising to send the reporter the contact of the education commissioner”.
When he did, all calls made to the education commissioner were terminated. Text messages sent to his number were also ignored”, the report added.