Emefielegate: Peep Inside How EFCC Is Battling To Unearth Masterminds Behind $6.23m Withdrawal From CBN As Forensic Expert Confirms Forgery Of Buhari, Mustapha’s Signatures

More details are unfolding by the day over the purported withdrawal of $6.23 million from the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) to paid foreign election observers.

BIGPEN NIGERIA (https://bigpenngr.com) reports that this came as Bamaiyi Meriga, a forensic expert on Thursday told the Federal Capital Territory High Court in Maitama, Abuja, that documents used to facilitate the withdrawal of $6.23 million from the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) last year were forged.

The money was withdrawn purportedly to pay foreign election observers during the 2023 general elections.

Mr Mairiga testified at Thursday’s proceedings in the ongoing trial of former CBN governor, Godwin Emefiele, on whose watch the suspicious, humongous withdrawal was made.

The former CBN governor is being prosecuted by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) on charges of fraud and corruption that he allegedly perpetrated while in office.

He denied the charges when he was rearraigned on amended 20 counts in January.

At the resumed hearing of the case on Thursday, Mr Meriga who testified as the fifth prosecution witness for the EFCC, said the signatures of then-President Muhammadu Buhari and then Secretary to the Government of the Federation (SGF), Boss Mustapha, were forged on the documents used to facilitate the $6.23 million withdrawal from the CBN on 8 February 2023.

Advertisement

While being led in evidence by the prosecuting lawyer, Rotimi Oyedepo, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), Mr Meriga said after a forensic analysis of the disputed documents, he found out that there was clear evidence of forgery.

“The conclusion from the analysis revealed that the disputed documents showed evidence of forgery and copying act, as the pen movement, form and formation of the signature and the skill of execution were found to be different from that of the specimen signatures marked exhibits a to ‘A2’ and ‘B’ to ‘B2.’

“The formation of the disputed signature marked: ‘X’ and ‘B’ to ‘B1’ was found to be different in respect of pen movement impulses, skill of execution, loop formation, presence of tremors; there were individual characteristics.

“This is a confirmation that the author of the specimen signature marked ‘B’ to ‘B1’ did not write the signature of Muhammadu Buhari on a disputed document marked ‘X’.

“Also, the form and formation of the disputed signature marked ‘X1’ and the specimen signatures marked ‘A’ to ‘A2’ were also found to be different in respect of pen movement impulses, terminal strokes, loop formation, presence of tremors and individual characteristics.

“This is also a confirmation that the author of the specimen signatures, marked ‘A’ to ‘A2’ did not write the signature of Boss Mustapha on the disputed document marked ‘X1,” Mr Mairiga explained.

Advertisement

Mr Mairiga said he later issued a report of his findings about what transpired.

Under cross-examination by defence lawyer,7 Matthew Burkaa, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), the witness said he was not a staff member of the EFCC but on secondment from the Nigerian Immigration Service.

The forensic expert said he did not work on Mr Emefiele’s signature.

He added that the seal of execution was different from the original copy.

Mr Oyedepo presented the two documents on ‘Presidential Directive on Foreign Observer Election’ and the court admitted them in evidence after a no-objection from the defence lawyer.

After the cross-examination, the judge adjourned the trial until 11 March.

Advertisement

(This report contains information from Premium Times)