El-Rufai, Associates Earmarked $600,000 to Bribe EFCC Officials – DSS Witness

A forensic investigator with the Department of State Services (DSS), Segun Kayode, has alleged that former Kaduna State Governor, Nasir El-Rufai, and some of his associates earmarked $600,000 to pay officials of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) and intermediaries.

Kayode, the first prosecution witness in the ongoing trial, made the allegation on Tuesday while testifying before the Kaduna State High Court sitting in Kawo, presided over by Justice Darius Khobo.

The investigator told the court that $500,000 and $100,000 were allegedly set aside for the payments, claiming that forensic audio recordings captured conversations involving El-Rufai and some of his suspected associates.

According to him, the conversations centred on alleged attempts to frustrate an EFCC investigation into a company identified as Singularity.

Kayode named a Senior Advocate of Nigeria, AU Mustapha; Jimi Lawal; and Bashir El-Rufai among those allegedly mentioned in the recordings.

He further alleged that Mustapha and Lawal were directed to meet one Ahmadu Sule to obtain a template previously used to liquidate another company, with the intention of applying a similar process to Singularity.

Advertisement

The witness said the discussions also included plans to liquidate the company in Nigeria and Mauritius, where it was reportedly under investigation by the Nigerian Financial Intelligence Unit.

Kayode additionally alleged that the recordings contained conversations about efforts to prevent the EFCC from investigating IHS, which he said was listed on the New York Stock Exchange.

The allegations formed part of the prosecution’s evidence against the former governor.

Defence challenges witness’s testimony

The proceedings lasted nearly eight hours, from 12:26 pm to 8:18 pm, with about two hours devoted to playing the recorded conversations.

Earlier, El-Rufai’s lead counsel, Paul Erokoro (SAN), objected to Kayode’s testimony, arguing that the witness’s name and summary of evidence were not included in the prosecution’s proof of evidence.

Advertisement

Erokoro contended that the omission undermined his client’s right to a fair hearing, insisting that the defence needed adequate notice of the evidence it was expected to answer.

However, counsel for the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC), Ayodeji Adedipe (SAN), argued that Kayode was a subpoenaed witness and that the omission did not automatically render his testimony inadmissible.

Adedipe told the court that the subpoena was issued and signed by the court on June 30, 2026, adding that the defence would have the opportunity to cross-examine the witness.

In response, Erokoro maintained that the issue was not whether Kayode could testify but whether the defence had been adequately informed to prepare for his evidence.

Citing Section 210 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Law, 2017, the defence counsel argued that the prosecution should have served the subpoena on the defence.

In its ruling, the court acknowledged that the witness’s name and summary of evidence were absent from the proof of evidence but held that the records showed he had been subpoenaed.

Advertisement

Justice Khobo ruled that the omission did not automatically make the testimony inadmissible, provided the defence was given the opportunity to cross-examine the witness.

The judge consequently overruled the objection and directed Kayode to continue his testimony.

After the witness submitted a hard copy of his findings to the court clerk, the defence complained that the document should have been served earlier to allow it to study its contents.

The judge ruled that the defence could obtain a certified true copy of the document admitted as Exhibit One for examination.

The court adjourned the case until November 30 and December 1, 2026, for continuation of cross-examination, following agreement by both parties.

El-Rufai arrives amid tight security

Advertisement

El-Rufai arrived at the court premises at about 11:50 am, ahead of the scheduled noon hearing, amid tight security.

He was accompanied by the African Democratic Congress governorship candidate in Kaduna State, Isa Ashiru.

His appearance followed an order by Justice Khobo directing the ICPC to produce him in court for the resumed proceedings.

The previous sitting was adjourned on Monday after the former governor was absent, following information that he had requested access to his personal physician to review medical test results.

The resumed hearing came days after the Court of Appeal in Kaduna dismissed El-Rufai’s appeal challenging the refusal of bail by the state high court.

In its judgment delivered on October 9, the appellate court upheld the lower court’s decision, ruling that the former governor had failed to establish sufficient grounds to warrant interference with the refusal of bail.

Advertisement

El-Rufai has been in ICPC custody since February 18, 2026, over allegations of financial misconduct linked to his administration of Kaduna State between 2015 and 2023.

The Kaduna State House of Assembly had petitioned the commission over the alleged diversion and mismanagement of more than N423bn in public funds during his eight-year administration.

Punch reports that the former governor is facing multiple cases involving allegations of money laundering, abuse of office, fraud and other financial offences before different courts.

He has denied wrongdoing and pleaded not guilty to the charges. The allegations remain subject to judicial determination.