The Senate had on Tuesday commenced a probe into the projects with the view to unravel the rationale behind the execution by Total Upstream Nigeria Ltd in partnership with CNOC Energy Nigeria Limited, Petrobas, and Sapetro without comply with the provisions of the Nigerian Oil and Gas Industry Content Development Act of 2010.
Senator Solomon Adeola, in a motion co-sponsored by 18 others had notified the Senate of the possible loss of revenue by the Federal Government as a result of the handling of the project.
His motion was adopted, leading to the setting up of a committee mandated to investigate the project.
Adeola, who chairs the Senate committee on Local Content, said various contracts were awarded to the various components of the Egina project adding that many of the contractors handling the project, were found to have engaged sub-contractors.
He stated that the Egina project was expected to comply with the provisions of the Nigerian Oil and Gas Industry Content Development Act of 2010.
The senator said: “At inception, the project was estimated to cost 6 billion dollars but has undergone various cost variations that currently put its cost at over 16. 352 billion dollars.
“At inception, the project boasted of 24 million man-hours of work done representing 77 percent of the workload for the project and equivalent to a workforce of 3000 persons on average over a period of five years. It is worrisome that over the life of the project, its cost components have been reviewed twice from the initial 6 billion dollars to 13 billion dollars and more recently 16.352 billion dollars.
“Meanwhile petitions have been submitted to the effect that monumental fraud and acts of disregard for the Nigerian Oil and Gas Industry Content Development Act of 2010 abound on the procurement and contractual arrangements.’
“Egina project is located within the Oil Mining Lease (OML) block 130 and covers an area of about 500 square miles. It is developed by Total Exploration and Production Nigeria Limited (24%) in partnership with CNOOC Energy Nigeria Limited (45%), Petrobas (16%), Sapetro(15%).
“The essence is to contribute an estimated 20,000 barrels of oil per day to the Nigerian daily oil production from the planned 2018 commencement date and the oil field is situated at a water depth of up to 1,750m.
Meanwhile, engineering studies for the Egina Oil-Field Project began in 2008, with an approval of the National Petroleum Investment Services (NAPIMS) and the Department of Petroleum Resources(DPR) in 2008 and 2009 respectively.
“The Egina project was conceived as a deep offshore field comprising of a Floating Production and “Offloading Vessels (EPSO). It was also conceived as an Oil Offloading Terminal and Subsea Production Systems,’’ Adeola submitted.
However, Senate President, Bukola Saraki while rounding off the deliberations said that the issue of cost variations and lack of adherence to the local content law were paramount.
He also charged the committee that the allegations were enormous and deserve to be well investigated.
He stated: “I find it difficult to understand why cost variation will move from 6 billion dollars to 16 billion dollars in 10 years. Why such variations and when will the Federal Government ever get revenue on these fields.
“If we allow this to go with the Egina project, other deep offshore will follow the same model and government will never get the revenue. The second issue is to ensure compliance with the local content law. The committee has the responsibility to turn in the report as soon as possible. We do not want the report to linger on.
“Please ensure you are done in three weeks so that by the time we resume we will consider the report and be able to address other projects that are going on.’’